Discussion:
Giants give Cueto some run support, which is a bit of an understatment9th inning
(too old to reply)
John Walsh
2021-05-20 20:36:59 UTC
Permalink
The final score was 19-4, with Cueto allowing only 1 run over 5
innings. HR's Duggar 2nd, Ruf 6th, Crawford 11th, Longoria 6th.

5 wins in a row and a +57 run differential.

Giants 19 Reds 4
\
poldy
2021-05-21 18:42:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Walsh
The final score was 19-4, with Cueto allowing only 1 run over 5
innings. HR's Duggar 2nd, Ruf 6th, Crawford 11th, Longoria 6th.
5 wins in a row and a +57 run differential.
Giants 19 Reds 4
\
Great to see them break out but hope it isn't a feast or famine type of
offense, where they score a ton to make the offensive numbers look
decent but then go 3-4 games struggling to put up runs.

Right before the Dodgers series, at least they didn't have to have a
high-pressure game for getaway day back to SF.
John Walsh
2021-05-29 07:18:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by poldy
Post by John Walsh
The final score was 19-4, with Cueto allowing only 1 run over 5
innings. HR's Duggar 2nd, Ruf 6th, Crawford 11th, Longoria 6th.
5 wins in a row and a +57 run differential.
Giants 19 Reds 4
\
Great to see them break out but hope it isn't a feast or famine type of
offense, where they score a ton to make the offensive numbers look
decent but then go 3-4 games struggling to put up runs.
Right before the Dodgers series, at least they didn't have to have a
high-pressure game for getaway day back to SF.
It's exactly the same feast or famine team it was last year. Sure and
they score a lot of runs in that game, they went cold the rest of the
way.

Ah, but I hope you watched tonight's game, because that was a superb
game, excpet for the starting pitching and Rogers in the bullpen. That
was the kind of game I've been waiting to see them play.

Loading...